What is Love?

Credit: FreeFoto.com

Credit: FreeFoto.com

Every civilization in every age has attempted to pin it down in every possible way, but it remains as elusive as ever.  And yet, in spite of our difficulties to define it, we feel pleasantly stirred by relationships that exist, say, between two persons, between two chimps, between a person and his pet, between the sky and the earth below, between the flowing river and a boatman dipping his oar in it as he returns home in the setting sun, in getting thoroughly wet in a drenching rain, or in imbuing silence in the core of our attention without a sliver of thought sandwiched in between. We cannot touch it, and yet, it is there touching us like the smell of earth after a sudden fresh shower: we can feel it only if we are there to feel it. In it, existence is celebrated; without it, life is a routine without any discovery.

LOVE is not possession. It is not sex, it is not anything that I could verbalize or think about. It cannot be practiced, cannot be summoned, and cannot be sought or demanded. It is unconditional, original, unsought, untouched, without any confine of disciplines chiseled by missions or motives. LOVE cannot be a goal; it cannot be shaped to follow any specific contour; it dances in its own dynamics. LOVE can embrace us, but we can’t embrace it.

One could cement the banks of a river in a specific way, giving it a boundary and a shape, confining it to move on a specific contour. But in that design the river is killed; it wouldn’t be its own dynamics but someone else’s; it wouldn’t be its own magic that would whisper in our ears its joyful splendor, but a dead one captured and preserved between a determinate corridor without any freedom to be, killing the attendant ecology that was once its mate in one wholeness. LOVE is the spontaneous dynamics in that wholeness; LOVE is the response in wholeness without any prepared script.

LOVE is to be felt. But a mind caught in its own design can feel only itself, can anticipate only itself; even its notion of the “other” is colored by its own agenda, own makeup, own preparation in which the “other” exists only in its terms. For such an occupied mind, there is no “feeling” beyond its own confine – hence, it cannot experience LOVE. Sure, a mind may know longing, it may hurt from separation, from suffering and pains it can conjure up through thought, but it’d not know LOVE since thought doesn’t know LOVE. In LOVE, there is none other but LOVE only.

To feel without thought, one must be beyond one’s chattering mind without any seeking, without any goal, without any conspicuous reason to go beyond “mind”. It is a state of attention without any subject or anything or anyone as its object. Subject/object dichotomy is the premise on which mind works; in LOVE, there is no premise — only LOVING in LOVING!

- Saumen Sen Gupta

Posted in Life & Relationship | 1 Comment

One Response to What is Love?

  1. EMMERENCIA W. says:

    life is alabout love. there can not be any peace in the world if love is not in place, in homes, between brothers and sisters feriendship, husband and wife etc

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

Foundation of Relationship

Everything in the universe is interconnected and interdependent.  Human beings are part and parcel of nature.  We can live joyfully, peacefully and creatively if we have a healthy and harmonious relationship with nature and with each other. Unfortunately our thinking creates divisions and differences in so many different ways.  These divisions deny love and are the main cause of so much conflict, misery and sorrow in the world.

The other day I was talking to a friend.  He described his relationship with the world in a very simple way.  He put a big dot on piece of paper and drew concentric circles around the dot.  He said, “The dot in the center is the “me”.  The concentric circles represent how much importance I attach to each person in my life.  The value of the person decreases with the increase in the length of the radius.” I asked him on what basis he had made his assessments?  He said, “In my mind I asked some questions.  The answers to these questions determined the place a particular person occupies in my mind.  For example I asked:circles

  1. How much the person had been useful to me in the past?
  2. How much the person is useful to me now?
  3. How much the person will be useful to me in the future?
  4. How much the person likes me, loves me and cares for me?
  5. Is the person obedient to me?
  6. Does the person give me company when I am lonely?
  7. Will the person care for me when I am sick?
  8. Does the person understand my likes and dislikes and is he/she supportive of my values and beliefs?
  9. Does the person appreciate me and give me respect?
  10. Does the person help me in the fulfillment of my desires and ambitions? etc.” 

He explained to me why he has placed his wife in the foremost position.  He said, “We are both sexually dependent on each other. Economically she is dependent on me but psychologically we are both dependent on each other.” 

I asked him, is it not true that his relatives and friends have same expectations from him?  He said, “As for as my family circle is concerned we have certain duties, responsibilities and obligations toward each other and we try to meet each others expectations, but outside this circle my relationship is purely utilitarian.  I have some friends, some are just acquaintances and with some people I have business relationship.    On the whole the relationship is based on give and take.  If a person does not satisfy my needs or if I don’t like a person for a particular reason I move away from him and choose someone else.”   

I asked him about his relationship with people who are outside these circles, i.e. with the world at large.  He said, “I don’t care much about other people.  Daily I am facing so many personal problems.  Where is the time to be concerned about other people.   There is nothing that I can do about the wars that are going on or about the poverty in the world.” 

About the nature of his personal problems he said, “ Every day some business related problems and family issues crop up.“   In the business world, I have to be constantly vigilant so that I am not deceived or cheated by some selfish crook. I have to make sure that I remain ahead of my competitors.  In the family, when ever someone’s expectation is not met there is a lot of hue and cry.   Being the head of the family, I have to face lot of turmoil.  By the end of the day, I am dead tired.”  Even the children exhibit so much rivalry and feel jealous of each other.  They sometime become aggressive and assertive and make me feel guilty.  Everyone demands attention.”   

About the impact of the problems on his body and mind he said, “I realize that any tension in the mind affects my health.  But I cannot help.  Sometime I get very much bored and frustrated and I want to run away from this prison but I can’t.  I am so much attached to the family.  They all depend upon me.  One time I had an argument with my wife.  She threatened to leave me.  I was totally devastated. There was so much anxiety and fear in my mind.  Luckily she did not carry out the threat.   Where would she go?  She is dependent on me economically and psychologically and moreover we have to take care of the children together.  So we are tied to each other for ever.  They say pleasure and pain are the two sides of the same coin.  So life goes on.” 

 He added, “I am telling you all this because you are my close friend.  No one else knows about what is going on in my family.  From the image that I project to the outside world everyone knows that I am a very happy go lucky fellow.” I asked him if he really loves the family members.  He replied, “Yes, I do, otherwise I would not be working so hard to cater to their ever-increasing demands and desires.” 

From the above conversation it is clear that thinking is the foundation on which we have built the whole structure of our relationships.  There is always a motive behind our thinking.  The motive decides the action.   From childhood the mind is being conditioned to think in terms of the “me” and “you”.  We are trained to make self-interest and self-concern as the main focus in life.  Life is governed by this self-enclosing and self-isolating thinking process.    From childhood the mind is educated to treat itself as the center of the universe.  The child is made to strive, up to the limits of his capacity, to make the rest of the universe minister to his selfish purposes. 

When a child is born there is natural relationship between the mother and the child and then between the father and the child.  He receives love, affection and care.  This natural relationship gets corrupted when the parents start interfering with the natural growth and development of the child.  They want the child to conform to the society.  Parents, themselves being part and parcel of the society, want the child to fit into the society.    Through comparison, through the system of reward and punishment, the parents and the society encourage the child to compete and become successful in order to serve mainly his interests and the interests of the family members. 

Education is concerned with the cultivation of intellect and not of intelligence.  No learning takes place about the totality and wholeness of life.  Attachment and possessiveness form the basis of family relationships.  Attachment is mistaken as an indication of love.  The pursuit of personal pleasure and personal gain become the norm of life.  Even the physical health is neglected.  From early childhood habits are formed to eat food that caters to the taste buds with little care given to its nutritional value.   No opportunity is given to the child to explore if there is something beyond thought based materialistic existence.  Appreciation of beauty, sensitivity to nature, and responsibility toward environment and fellow human beings is given very little significance. 

Living in the vast world we create these small circles of relationship which are very limited.  This very limitation becomes the cause of strife and suffering in the world.  Conflicting desires, demands and expectations inevitably create tension and stress. We want to solve the problems arising out of conflicting interests without touching the root cause of human predicament. 

Need for psychological security forms the basis of self-interest and self-interest forms the basis of relationship.  Psychologically, thinking is rooted in the idea of the “me” being separate from “you”.  This naturally creates division between “me” and “you”.  We take these divisions for granted because these divisions exist all over the world.  Our own thinking creates these divisions and we treat these divisions as part of our “human nature.”  The fact is that the “self” by its very nature is not secure.  It is based on an idea. The idea about who “I” am. Idea is not the reality.  But thinking treats the “self” as real.  Because of this illusion, thinking is all the time trying to  provide a sense of security, certainty, stability and permanency to the “self”. 

This motive is ingrained in our thinking process.  For example, thinking creates the feeling of certainty through the process of attachment with people, property, and with ideas and beliefs. Because of our own need for psychological security, we get attached to certain people and we call that attachment – love. But in the process we get isolated from other people to whom we are not attached.  Unfortunately, attachment does not provide the certainty we seek because it is dependent on the whims, requirements, desires and demands of people on whom we depend. 

An individual can never feel secure as long as he is isolating himself from the rest of the world.  There is no way that an individual can be free from fear, loneliness and anxiety so long as the cause of the problem is not deeply understood.  The understanding of the cause is the ending of the cause.  Truth can come into being only when the false is seen as the false.

Posted in Life & Relationship | 3 Comments

3 Responses to Foundation of Relationship

  1. Farshori says:

    This is one of the best article i have read on this site and it goes onto make me more curious of what all is yet to come! Do you also conduct webinars or have any videos?

  2. Meghan says:

    Attachment, that which we call “love” is actually an isolating force whether that attachment be to people, property, or belief systems. Nice! Very clear and straight forward. When something is said that is just so right (true, real, honest), it resonates.

  3. Sherlock I. Graham-Haynes says:

    I have thoroughly enjoyed reading the article: “Foundation of Relationship.”

    Your article brilliantly demonstrates that failure to make certain kinds of distinctions, can, and, often do cause us tremendous pain and suffering in our lives. As such, failure to “observe” that the idea of who I am, is NOT the same as the reality of who I am. This seems to be the source of our collective crisis of perception.
    Indeed, we typically regard the “stuff” as real, and, the “non-stuff” as not real or not consequential, when, the reverse is the case.
    When we regard ourselves as individuals, and, as being real, we fail to see that we have just committed a category mistake, since, individuals are illusions! And, the “non-stuff” the undifferentiated stuff is most enduring, and, is in fact reality!
    Hence, and, I agree with you artful conclusion, that is: “the understanding of the cause is the ending of the cause!
    Thank you!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

Prayer for Peace

Credit: FreeFoto.com

Credit: FreeFoto.com

May there be peace among the gods in heaven and among the stars; may there be peace on earth, among men and four footed animals; may we not hurt each other; may we be generous to each other, may we have that intelligence which will guide our life and actions; may there be peace in our prayers, on our lips and in our hearts.

- Rigveda

This prayer for peace was written many centuries ago.  When a person reads the prayer with total attention i.e. with his heart and mind, it may have value beyond words but merely repeating it mechanically as part of a ritual has no meaning whatsoever.  There can be peace when human beings live in a healthy and harmonious relationship with nature and with each other.  There can be healthy relationship only when there is love, care and affection.   

This prayer is born out of intelligence.  To see the interconnectedness and interdependence of life is an act of intelligence.  To realize the value of peace is an act of intelligence. The prayer is for intelligence because there can be peace only when our actions are guided by intelligence. Only intelligence and love have the power to bring about clarity and order in the mind.  What is stated in the prayer is not an ideal or a goal to be achieved in the future.  Prayer has to be on the lips and in our hearts.  Our actions cannot go wrong when our hearts are filled with love.   Only a mind that is peaceful can bring about peace in the world.  

In the prayer life is perceived holistically, not in terms of “my life” and “your life”.    The individual is part and parcel of the whole and not a separate entity concerned only with his own self-fulfillment. There is peace when there is sharing and cooperation. Individuals need peaceful environment to grow and flower in goodness and to realize their full potential.  They also need order and peace in their own mind to find out for themselves if there is something sacred in life.   

The prayer is not addressed to some outside agency but it is directed inwardly.  The necessary conditions for peace have been laid down very clearly.  The question is why do we not live this way?  Why do we hurt each other and why do we lack the intelligence which should guide our actions?  There must have been individuals in the past and there may be some people living in the world now who moved away from the stream of selfishness, but the majority of people are caught in the network of thought that has taken a firm hold in our consciousness.  

As a result of unintelligent thinking and unintelligent living the individual remains bereft of the joy of life and at the same time is directly and indirectly responsible for all the mess and misery in the world.  The individual and society are inextricably linked with each other and are constantly feeding each other.  If the individuals as separate entities are confused and full of contradictions inwardly they must necessarily produce a society as the existing one where there is so much conflict and sorrow.  This very chaotic world becomes the environment in which the lives of individuals are shaped and nurtured.  

There is no doubt about the fact that self-centeredness is the root cause of human suffering.  Pursuit of personal pleasure, struggle for power, position and prestige, endless desires and greed inevitably generate sorrow.  We desperately need peace.  Generation after generation prayer is still being recited but peace is nowhere in sight.  Evidently prayer only remained on our lips but did not enter our hearts.   Prayer remained in the mind as an idea.  Ideas can create hope and give some solace to the mind but by their very nature ideas cannot solve the human problem.  Understanding leads to action.  Ideas are, however, imagined concepts handed down by tradition.   

Ideas create contradiction between what we actually are and what we think we should be.  Contradiction breeds conflict and this conflict does not bring about peace. Ideas cannot bring about love, care and affection because they do not take care of the complexity of the problem. People continue to operate on the basis of violence because of strong psychological reasons.  What is actually taking place has lot of energy and momentum behind it.  The momentum has a cause.  No change is possible unless we understand the cause. 

The way we think, the way we create and worship authority, the way we get influenced by propaganda, the way we cling to beliefs, ideas and opinions, the way prejudices are built up in the mind – these become the ground for hatred, fear and violence.  Identification with an idea, belief or nation may provide a false sense of security, but collectively such identification threatens physical security. 

There is no denying the fact that our own thinking is responsible for all the confusion, conflict and chaos in the world.  Psychologically our thinking is rooted in the idea of the “me” as an independent entity.  The “self” treats itself separate from “you”.  It divides itself from “you”.  This “me” is the imagined structure of thought.  In itself it has no reality.  This idea of the “me” has created in the mind a movement of selfishness.  The self-centered activity of our thinking creates divisions in so many different ways.  These divisions breed conflict at all levels of human relationship.  

The rapidly deteriorating situation demands that we must take a fresh look at the whole design and predicament in which we are caught.  A fresh look implies that the mind is free from prejudice, conclusion or ideation.  The mind must be free from self-interest and self-concern.  Our primary concern should be to look at the facts.  Seeing things as they are brings clarity of perception.  Clarity of perception facilitates intelligence which only can take us out of the mess that we have created.

Your comments are most welcome.        

Contact: sardarsingh@msn.com

 

Posted in Prayers | 5 Comments

5 Responses to Prayer for Peace

  1. Dear Sardar,
    Good morning.
    I read all your posts and seems to me very interesting things and while real.
    We can make anyone understand alone by itself will K’s teachings and to see the truth?
    Thank you in advance.
    Have a nice day.

  2. The commentary on “Prayer for Peace” asserts: “To realize the value of peace is an act of intelligence”. Surely, the notion of a “value” arises out of comparisons, out of desires, out of the needs our goals that we create in our mind demand, and, thus, value and its realization are totally mind-driven, and have nothing to do with any reality. For a mind to be tethered to “unreal” seen as “real” couldn’t be an act of “intelligence”, could it?

    On the second line, it is indicated: “When a person reads the prayer with total attention i.e. with his heart and mind, it may have value beyond words but merely repeating it mechanically as part of a ritual has no meaning whatsoever”. Fair enough! But in a “total attention” could there be any prayer? Could there be any goal as “peace” in that existence? In “total attention”, there is only existence, undivided, unitary, one whole. Where is either “prayer” or its object “peace” as distinct entities in that existence? If you and I are all that one existence, how could I ever pray for you or you pray for me? In attention, there is nothing but attention. Therefore, attention is not “concentration” or “contemplation” because then it would be all in duality. Attention arises when mind is NOT, when there is no object it is bound to. Attention begins when all
    evaluation, all identification, all concentration, contemplation end. Attention is the freedom in which “seeing” takes place.

    We could see “Prayer for Peace” on the basis that the “Man Made Mind” offers; we need not go far. For a mind engaged in myriads of social processes through reactions, through convolutions, could it ever “see” truth? Could a mind ever “create” any truth? Could a mind ever “anticipate”, “contemplate”, “concentrate” on truth? Isn’t the word “peace” just a concept for each one of us created, concocted, shaped, and designed by our minds? Isn’t “prayer” another concept that a mind creates? Pray to whom? Who is this authority to whom this prayer is addressed? If an ‘authority’ as a separate entity exist other than “this existence”, isn’t the mind entering into its own delusion?

    We talk about “peace” as though we all know what it is! Can we really identify “peace” if we ever encounter it? Has any society historically ever encountered “peace” without embracing “violence”? Has anyone ever known “peace” other than as an interlude between two consecutive blots of “violence”? Can light appear without darkness? Can we conceive of
    “richness” without “poverty”? So long a mind is prepared to accept one wouldn’t the other follow at its wake? Only couple of days back I read on NY Tiimes (May 21, 2009) a report depicting an absurd situation of Armenians sharing a common border with Turkey at a village called Lusarat being wary of improved relationship with Turkey that could usher in “peace” somehow one day. “No peace”, they would shout, “until Turkey concedes the responsibility for the systematic massacre of Armenians under Ottoman rule during world war I”.

    Those Armenians don’t want peace UNLESS it is in their own terms. And, that, Sir, is the problem all across the world: Peace will follow so long it is in my terms, in my nation’s terms, in my society’s understanding, on their mandate, on what my religion dictates. So, what happens to peace? It becomes an entity sandwiched between two dollops of violence. We become imprisoned in our own concepts, which no prayer would have the power to undo. The proof? Look what we have received so far through payers, through petitions, through supplications!

    • Sardar Singh says:

      It has been rightly said that for a mind to be tethered to “unreal” seen as “real” couldn’t be an act of intelligence. It appears that in the ‘prayer of peace’ the mind has stepped out of the “unreal” as it sees clearly that not hurting each other and peace is one and the same thing. If not hurting each other is merely an idea then of course the prayer is meaningless. Ideas cannot create peace. Ideas do not have any clue of what peace is. I have tried to clarify my understanding of the ‘prayer for peace’ in the article “Right Action for Peace.” Actually we do not know out of what state of mind the Sanskrit chant was composed. Living in this modern civilization we need to explore why do we hurt each other and can this activity come to an end?

  3. Farshori says:

    Prayers should be free of social and religious barriers.. should be from the heart and should be expressed to the lord with an open mind.. Prayer has it’s powers if we only knew!

  4. JP says:

    Thanks for writing, I truly liked your newest post. I think you should post more frequently, you obviously have natural ability for blogging!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

Man Made Mind – Part 3

Credit: FreeFoto.com

Credit: FreeFoto.com

The other day I was talking to a young couple.  The wife complained that the husband gets angry even on trivial issues and is unable to control his anger.  I asked the boy why he gets angry.  He said, “I get angry because I get hurt when she says something I don’t like.”  I asked him what exactly gets hurt because the word “I” stands for his whole body and the mind.  For example when there is pain in the leg you say my leg is hurting or when you have pain in the finger you say my finger is hurting.  He was a little perplexed.  Evidently he had never confronted this question before.  He, however, said that he had some beliefs, some values and if someone says something that is contrary to his beliefs he gets hurt. 

The husband ought to know that when he gets angry his wife does not like him and when the wife does not like him he gets upset again.  So the anger comes back to him.  We all need to know that the anger is not confined to one particular person.  We all get angry when our belief system is challenged.  It is, therefore, of utmost importance that we should understand anger and know what exactly gets hurt.  When we look at anger we should be free from any feeling of justification or guilt.  We need to use our capacity for rational, objective and unbiased thinking and also our capacity for pure observation.  Pure observation means to see things as they actually are.  In full attention and awareness we can see thought as it arises in the mind.  We can see the source of that thought.  

There is a clear distinction between the tree and the word “tree”.   The word is used as a means of communication.  We can always see the tree without the word.   Same way the word “I” stands for my physical body and everything that is contained in my brain.  The brain is the storehouse of knowledge, memory and experience.  Brain has the capacity to think and respond to various challenges in life.   We ought to be able to make a clear distinction between the word “I” and the thing it stands for. The word “I” is only a means of communication. But this is not what is actually taking place in our mind. 

In our mind there is a psychological entity called the “I”, the “me”, the “self”.   Our own thinking creates this “I” and treats it as a real entity.   This is done through the process of attachment and identification.   Thinking is changing all the time.  It is in the state of movement.  For its own stability and security thinking creates in the mind a permanent entity.  Thinking has devised ways to keep this entity secure, stable and permanent.  Thinking establishes its continuity by identifying it with something or the other.  It is identified with something greater which it feels is secure and permanent.  Without the process of identification and attachment there is no entity called the “I”.    

The amazing thing about the “self” is that it is made up of words, symbols, images, ideas, opinions and beliefs.  But it has acquired immense significance.  Our life is governed by it.  We protect the “self” the same way as we protect the body.  There is automatic response if there is any challenge to my “self-esteem” or to my “self-image”.   Thought has created in the mind an everlasting need for psychological security.  Even an utterance of a word that is contrary to what I believe to be true can hurt my feelings very badly. Attachment to ideas, things and some special people give us only a false sense of security because such security is always under threat.  So we always live in perpetual fear. 

 In many people the significance of “Self” goes far beyond the attachment to the body or to material things.  They are ready even to sacrifice their own life in order to protect the “self” not knowing that the “self” is contained in their own brain cells as a result of influence, indoctrination, and conditioning of the mind by the propaganda of the priests and politicians.  

We need to very carefully look at all the implications of the man made mind. Identification with ideas, opinions and beliefs brings about division and creates conflict at all levels of human relationship.  There is obvious fallacy in the whole divisive process.  People are caught in self-created illusion.  This illusion is the cause of human ignorance. Not being aware of the facts or ignoring the facts and clinging to ideas brings about ignorance.  It is an undeniable fact that basically, fundamentally human beings are the same yet each one has a very strong feeling that he is different from others.  Unfortunately even the religions encourage and strengthen this feeling.  At the physical level the differences are obvious and must be appreciated.  But are we different from each other psychologically?

All human beings, irrespective of color, caste, creed, sex, religion or nationality face the same life of pleasure, pain and sorrow.  We are all fearful, uncertain and feel insecure.  Our perceptions and responses to challenges of life and our basic urges, desires and demands are similar.  We get influenced the same way.  Below the layers of superficial cultural differences runs the same stream of selfishness and self-centeredness.  Each person is pursuing ambition, greed and self-fulfillment.  Each person is concerned with himself.  Psychologically we get hurt the same way.  Each one protects the image that he has created about himself.  Our beliefs may be different but the reason why we believe in something or the other is the same.  The reason being the need for security created by the “self” that is insecure by its very nature.  

Existing human situation makes it abundantly clear that a fundamental change must take place in the human consciousness if we want to live in peace and harmony with each other.  Only a profound understanding can bring about inward revolution.  A person who is serious must pay attention to the way he thinks and acts.  Self-knowledge is the beginning of wisdom.  At present our perceptions are based on the knowledge, memory and experience that we have accumulated on the basis of false premises.  A person who is serious must drop the entire load of accumulation and look anew.  The very pause to look is a significant new step. Your comments are most welcome.    

Contact: sardarsingh@msn.com

Posted in Life & Relationship | 3 Comments

3 Responses to Man Made Mind – Part 3

  1. Saumitra says:

    Sir,

    Good to see your website and to read through your thoughts. It is nostalgic to read these and appear to be concurrent with our previous dialogs.

    Questions and thoughts:
    - Is love just another feeling, emotion or ‘entity’ like anger, hatred or greed? If yes, then it does it matter what state of mind one is in to act in one way or the other? And if not, is it then not a state of conflict?

    - Is love necessary for a successful relationship? Can purity of thought and self-realization not be the only condition for success of any relationship?

    - Prejudices and childhood sanskars predominantly rule every action we take. What is then a good way to bring up children? Since children do not know what they do not know, can learning through experiences be sufficient for their self-knowledge?

    Warm Regards,
    Sam

    • Hoes does a mango taste?

      A legitimate question is raised: “Is love just another feeling, emotion or ‘entity’ like anger, hatred or greed? If yes, then does it matter what state of mind one is in to act in one way or the other? And if not, is it then not a state of conflict?”
      I wonder how one could attempt to answer this interesting question! Surely, to answer it authentically, we need to know if there is a possibility – not in somebody else’s life, but in our own personal lives — to know it differently, to understand it beyond “feeling”, beyond “emotion”, beyond our little “self”, which generally compares, concocts, designs, projects, estimates and then announces to the world that TRUTH has been found. Only an honest, authentic answer could reveal “Love” so cherished, so adored, so misused, so ignored, so misunderstood; and, that revelation must come forth, must emerge from the one interested in looking into this beyond the concept, beyond any social acceptance of the word. Only then it is authentic, ethical, and living.
      Suppose, I say: “No, love is not like that! Love is: “blah, blah, blah”, and this is the whole truth about it.” Then, it would be my take on it, it would be another proposition that I personally stand for, but its value as a truth is worthless to billion others who might have figured out “love” differently. It would be my concept of love, my belief escorted via the label “love”, but it wouldn’t be live, moving, kicking, and screaming beyond me. So, what do we do?
      Surely, it is not anyone’s belief – even if it is beautiful, rich, and spectacular – that makes up truth. Also, even if the entire world tends to subscribe to it as “truth”, it may be just our collective fervent wish, our social tendency to size up things in terms of large numbers. If the majority believes in X — surely, the society tends to argue — X must be true. Either, we accept societal approach, or, we could say, even if hesitatingly, perhaps, just perhaps, that there might be another way to find out what love is all about. Could there be such a thing called love that is beyond my personal feeling, emotion, my personal take, my conditional living that I have accepted from the society?
      To find that out, we need to discover it within our own selves. Someone else’s answer won’t do; I need to find out myself. I have to discover, I have to find out what love is all about for me, within me, without me, with all of us together, with each of us as separate islands without any relation, etc. If someone asks me to say a few words about the “taste of mangoes”, no matter how or what I say about it would be totally misappropriate. You want to find out how a mango does taste like, well, let’s eat mangoes, lots of it, many different types of it in many varieties, in many nuances, texture, color, smell, and touch. Only then we could each individually understand how a mango does taste like (we may not be able to verbalize it ever, but in the depth of our understanding we’d know), and that would not be a social knowledge, but a discovered understanding within.
      The key to every understanding is self-discovery. You can’t discover something for me; I’ve to do it myself. I’ve to relate to it – not as an adjunct – but as a BEING in the core of it, moving with it, dancing with it, suffering with it, elating with it, without dropping anything, without including anything from outside. To know “love”, must I not be in “love” without exclusions, without inclusions, without conditions, without any external grammars, syntax and semantics? To know “love” differently beyond what my little “self” concocts, must I not discover it in that refreshing precinct where “I” am “aware” — not the society, not the authority, but yours truly — at the very core of it?
      Please also read article on “What is Love.” Response to your question on Education will be posted in a few days.

  2. Meghan says:

    But at some point, the conditioning HAS been examined and then what is left? would you say there is an appropriate “time” to put the past away and enter into this beingness?

    If the “beingness” presents itself as a separate entity into which one “enters” at a specific time point, isn’t one still “conditioned”? Are there two on the table so to speak: Me, and my “beingness”? Who will inform us about “what is left after conditioning HAS been examined”? And will that third party information soothe our pains and frustrations elevating us to a plateau where we had never been before? Will that information open forth the spring of our personal joy and understanding? If someone tells me what an ice cream actually tastes like, could that information satisfy my taste for an ice cream?

    The only person who could answer this question is the person raising it, and that, too, only from a basis where all her conditioning is “GONE”. Otherwise, one cannot truly “see” what is “left” so long one is “conditioned”, so long one is “unaware”, so long one is in “time” (all three are the same). But, once all conditionings are gone what “question” could still persist as a residue?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

Man Made Mind – Part 2

Credit: FreeFoto.com

Credit: FreeFoto.com

When we look at the mountain from a distance, we are captivated by its grandeur, majesty, and beauty.  We feel joyful and peaceful.  This joy and peace is not the result of effort, will or desire.  We mentioned earlier how the two year old twins at the lake responded when they saw the ducks.  Both were dancing with joy.  We can call this the dance of life. Parents of the children were part of this dance.  Luckily because I was there, I was also participating in this dance. The whole cosmos, the sun, the air, the weather, the lake, the trees and the birds were making this dance possible.  The joy was not the result of an achievement of a goal set by thinking.  

 No doubt human beings are endowed with the power of thinking.  But they are also endowed with abilities that are beyond the process of thinking.  Human potential is beyond any limit. Human beings have the energy that is the very source of life on earth.  They have the ability to enjoy the beauty of the earth and experience the mystery of life.  They have the ability to see things as they actually are without the involvement of memory and thought.  In this state of awareness thought completely ceases.  In this state of intelligence we gain insight into different areas of life.  Albert Einstein said, “I never came upon any of my discoveries through the process of rational thinking.”  

 Human beings have the ability to experience the mystery of life in the form of love that is unconditional and without any cause.  In this state of love there is bliss and peace.  Life is relationship.  I am related one way or the other, intimately or remotely, to nature and to all human beings.  The state of my physical, mental and spiritual health depends to a large extent on the quality of my relationships with nature and fellow human beings.  Right relationship means to respond accurately, which means to respond with love and care.  

Now the question arises why human beings are not able to live in peace and harmony with nature and with each other?  Why there is so much conflict, misery and sorrow in the world?  Why there is lack of love, compassion, affection and care? Why hate, anger, fear, violence, greed and jealousy have become so much dominant factors in our life?  Why  there is so much poverty, injustice and degradation?   By the power of thinking human beings made tremendous progress in the field of science and technology. Same instrument of thought is being used to bring about self destruction.  Is there a way out of this mess?  

The quest for intelligent living and the search for a better society is perhaps as old as man himself.  Saints and philosophers examined life from different angles and prescribed codes of conduct.  Psychologists carried out research into the conscious and subconscious mind and provided a plethora of findings on the basis of detailed analysis.  But the fact is that despite all the knowledge and experience accumulated through centuries man has not been able to produce a harmonious and healthy society.  Technological progress has further complicated matters.  More and more education instead of helping man is making the situation still worse.  All the ideological and management approaches to the problems have failed.  It needs to be examined what is wrong in all the attempts to make life better and worth living. 

Let us take the case of current world-wide economic crisis.  Media calls this as our issue number one.  How did we respond to the situation?  First of all only some individuals here and there have been blamed for the crisis.  These include some top executives and business people in the financial market and some home buyers who got the loans which they could not even afford to pay.  Lack of regulations was also cited as one of the reasons.  US government and politicians moved quickly to fix the problem.  Stimulus Plan to boost the economy was worked out.  It is said that new laws to regulate the financial market will be enforced and everything will be alright in due course.   

Although it has been mentioned in the media over and over again that greed is at the root of this economic mess, yet very little attention has been paid to the basic cause of the problem.  Greed is taken for granted.  We say it is part of human nature and then forget about it.  It is believed that new rules and regulations will take care of this problem.  Past history clearly shows that greed always overpowers.  Cunning, clever and greedy people, including the politician, always find ways to bypass the rules.  The tragedy is that we do not see the gravity and the depth of the problem.  Greed is not confined to just a small percentage of population.  If each person carefully looks at his mind he will find that in so many subtle ways his actions are guided by greed.    

Greed transcends racial, religious and national differences arising out of cultural conditioning of the mind.  Priests and preachers of all faiths who claim to be the custodians of ethics and morality mechanically repeat what others in the past centuries have said about greed.  They tell people not to be greedy but they themselves are the most greedy people on earth because they mint money not by doing any constructive work but by simply preaching what they themselves do not do. 

Our problems continue because we do not see them clearly.  We do not see clearly because our minds are befogged with ideas, opinions, beliefs, conclusions and influences.  So the first step is to use our ability of pure and objective observation that helps us to see things as they actually are.  The challenge is to drop the entire load of accumulation and look anew.  The very pause to take a fresh look is a significant new step.  Clarity of perception is our top priority.  When we are looking at the problems we need to make sure that we are concerned with facts only. In our dialogue we should move from fact to fact and not from one idea to another idea.  Please do respond with your comments or questions.   

Sardar Singh

sardarsingh@msn.com

Posted in Life & Relationship | 1 Comment

One Response to Man Made Mind – Part 2

  1. JP says:

    I was just searching around about this when I stumbled on your blog post. I’m simply dropping by to say that I definitely liked seeing this post, it’s really well written. Are you thinking of writing more about this? It appears like there’s more depth here for future posts.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

Man Made Mind – Part 1

Credit: FreeFoto.com

Credit: FreeFoto.com

Generally I go for a walk around the lake which is very close to our house. One day I met a young couple who had come to the lake along with their two daughters. I was told that the kids were two years old and identical twins. I was fascinated to see the way the children responded when they saw the ducks in the lake. Both of them were very much excited and full of joy and happiness. They would go close to the ducks but would immediately back off. They played this game for quite some time. I think it is worthwhile to ask, why are we not able to maintain the same sense of freedom and happiness throughout our life? 

Human brain has unbounded intellectual potential and an amazing power of the mind. Because of this potential human beings have made tremendous progress in the field of science and technology. Resources and ingenuity have been mobilized to create variety of goods and services. But in the bargain we have lost innocence and our capability to enjoy life. We have miserably failed in creating a healthy and harmonious relationship with each other. The state of my physical, mental and spiritual health depends to a large extent on the quality of my relationship with nature and other human beings. A sane world implies where there is right relationship. Right relationship means to respond with love and care. Unfortunately human beings are not living that way.

The significant problems that we face arise out of numerous conflicts arising out of human relationships. Any type of conflict brings about pain, misery and sorrow. There is conflict between husband and wife, between parent and child, between one group and another. There is enormous confusion, violence, brutalities, the wars, terrorism and endless division on the basis of religion and nationalities. There is also the problem of poverty, overpopulation and environmental degradation. All problems are interrelated and affect each and every human being in one way or the other. It is so obvious that when the children grow up they will be affected by the world in which they live.

Although each one of us is born with certain distinct physical and intellectual characteristics yet when we examine very carefully we will find that psychologically we are not different from each other. All human beings, irrespective of their color, caste, creed, religion and nationality are fearful, uncertain, feel insecure and face the same life of pleasure, pain and sorrow. Our perceptions and responses to challenges of life and our basic urges, desires, demands are similar. Our consciousness is shaped by the culture in which we live. Our mind gets influenced the same way. The society shapes the individual and the individuals create the society. The individual and the society are inseparable. If we are really concerned about the deterioration that is taking place in the world we must understand the nature of the human mind.

Our thinking determines the nature of our consciousness. Our thinking determines our actions. The ultimate source of our problems is in thought. Psychologically we are not different from each other because the process of our thinking is the same. Our own thinking is responsible for the existing state of the world. We can very safely say that the mind that we have inherited and the mind that has been shaped by the society is man made mind. If there is lack of clarity in our thinking and if there irrationality in our thinking it will inevitably create the monstrous society in which we live. There is only one question that we need to answer. Can we be free of the old, rotten, traditional mind and create a new mind?

In order for that to happen we must understand the existing framework of mind and in the process of self-enquiry and self-examination eradicate from our mind all thinking that is based on false premises and all thinking that is contradictory and therefore creates confusion in the mind and conflict in human relationship. Love, compassion, goodness and generosity are the key factors that can bring about a healthy and harmonious relationship. Love is not a process of thought. The action of love has no motive. The mind that is in state of love is a religious mind. When love expresses itself through our hearts we experience a state of bliss. Without love life has very little meaning. Is it possible for us to bring that quality of love in our life so that the future generations can also live in peace and harmony?

We would like the readers to actively participate in the dialogue so that we may together explore this vast and complex territory called the mind and find out the root cause of our problems. We can examine the existing framework of the mind only when we are in pure state of observation. Our observation should be objective, free from bias, prejudice, opinion, judgment or conclusion. Only such a mind can see things as they actually are. Human beings do have this capability if they are willing to exercise it. No problem can be understood without clarity of perception. Clarity of perception facilitates the operation of intelligence which is the basic instrument to wipe out the mess that man has created.

Posted in Life & Relationship | 10 Comments

10 Responses to Man Made Mind – Part 1

  1. Farshori says:

    We tend to overcome few of our mental blocks and surpass some, is it a conscious decision we make with our ego!? I believe ego is our major hurdle in creating a more loving and caring world for our new generation! your comments please

    • SardarSingh says:

      Change is always taking place within the framework of the ego. Our thinking is in a state of movement. It is changing all the time. As a result of some conscious or unconscious decisions modification do take place but these modifications and adjustments are within the perimeters of the ego. Decisions are made on the basis of pleasure/pain principle. We always invite pleasure and avoid pain. This process inevitably brings about fear. Change has no value so long as the structure remains intact.

      “I” am not separate from the ego. “I” am ego. Psychologically so long as there is this sense of the “me” as separate from “you” there cannot be love. Ego and love cannot co-exist. By its very existence ego denies love. Ego is the structure created by thought. Thinking has its roots in knowledge, memory and experience. Knowledge is always limited. Love, however, has no boundaries. Ego by its very nature is divisive. Love is all inclusive. Thinking is goal oriented. There is always motive hidden in the thought process. Love is unconditional. Jealousy, hate, anger and violence are part and parcel of the ego. Love has no relationship with these. Love is not he opposite of hate or jealousy. Love is a state of mind that is free from fear, hate and jealousy. Attachment, possessiveness, aggressiveness, assertiveness are the characteristics of the ego. Love is not attachment. A person who is ambitious, seeking power, position and status does not know what love is.

      Only in the state of awareness of our own thinking process can we see the drama that is going on in the mind. This awareness is not directed by any motive. It is, therefore free from ideas, opinions and conclusions. It is pure, objective observation of facts as they are. When the person sees the snake as the snake then he gently moves away from it. This does not require any will or effort.

  2. R.P Singh says:

    I think there is no life without the ship of relations. There are two types of relations we have , one we get them when we join this world let’s call them Type I , the other one is we collect them while we flot in our Titanic journey (which has to end one day) let’s call them with Type II.

    The difficulty with the relations Type I is that we have lot of expectations from them and they have lot from us. Both of us seldom reach at a point. But whatever they are however difficulty you face in managing them the tie can’t be broken , you crib they crib but maintain the relations and let the ship float till it reaches the Titanic end.

    The Type II is quit flexible, both of us work towards managing the relation , but if some fishy thing crops in relation, then both of them take their own path and reach the Titanic end with or without let them know each other.

    Actually life doesn’t need any relation. It is the relation that needs the relation.

    • SardarSingh says:

      Out of our relationship with each other we have created the society in which we live. Our relationships are primarily based on self-interest. The foundation of relationship is therefore very weak. In response to your comments we have posted an article called “Foundation of Relationship” on this website.

  3. Farshori says:

    Thanks for your response, two terms always seem ambiguous, even though they sound and seem to be poles apart they exist together, I am talking about “Love” and “Possessiveness”, is Possessiveness a stepping stone to understand deep love!? is it pure ego or just an insecure love!? Let me know your thoughts?

    • SardarSingh says:

      Our thinking is conditioned to operate within a certain framework. This framework is the creation of our own thought process. The need for psychological security is the ground on which this whole structure of ideas, opinions, concepts has been created. Need for physical security is an absolute necessity. Our life demands it. But we need to understand the craving for psychological security. Thinking has created very intricate, subtle and complex mechanism to defend the “self”. Possessiveness is one of the ways in which thinking tries to make the “self” secure. The things that we possess or the things to which we are attached appear to be stable and permanent. But the fact is that there is no stability and certainty in any of the things we get identified with. Love has no relationship with attachment or possessiveness. Only the mind that is free from this illusory need for psychological security can know what love is.

  4. Omer says:

    The saying from Albert Einstein; ”I never came upon any of my discoveries through the process of rational thinking” Yes we have to be very ”Still” for to go beyond the process of the rational thinking machinery,no?
    As J.Krishnamurti has said; The very noise of the self prevents its own dissolution (from the only Revolution), He said one has to have a very quiet mind to find out what life is all about and what is Meditation (The Impossible question), The movement of silence is the only field in which there is a chance (Bombay 1958) That silence has its own…operation on society (Bombay 1957.
    greeting Omer

  5. Saumen Sengupta says:

    Why is it that we long to emulate someone else considered as an authority? Is it because we want to be correct, proper, and “intelligent” like them? What if we are just ourselves with our share of success and failures, with our mistakes, with our laurels as they come? If “seeing” is what counts, then let’s see, let’s discover, and let’s understand the way it comes to us in our own vision rather than what Krishnamurti, Eckhart Tolle, or others, ancient or modern, have penned or advised. At least, then, the poetry of “seeing” is ours.

    Isn’t it more fun, more enriching, more satisfying to discover something on our own without leaning on to anybody? The “NEW” (not the old, not the already discovered by K or Gita, not the anticipated one) can emerge within our vision only if we are open to it with our total being without any condition, meaning without Krishnamurti, without Meister Eckhart dictating our thoughts and choices! Doesn’t it mean to be open to completely without any reservation, without any barrier, without any desire to color it, shape it, and manipulate it?

    • Omer says:

      Dear Saumen sengupta

      Yes, What are we, if our minds are full of the things (Teachings)of others?
      It is true, there is no space, no silence, to find things out for oureselves, in our lives, if there is, or not something beyond The ”Me”, The ”I”, The ”Ego”, That which is Sacred, Holy, Intelligence.
      But I think, it is also depending on how one looks, listening, to somebody like J.Krishnamurti, don’t you think?
      He also said many times in his talks, dialoques, etc; I am not your Authority, I am not your Saviour, I am not your Guru, I am not your spiritual Teacher to tell you what to do, the truth of another is not your truth, the truth is a Pathless land, you are standing alone, Be a light to yourself, etc. He said I am only a mirror in which you can see yourself in it, thats all. So I was very interesting in what that Man has to say.
      He seemed to lived a life in Emptiness, free of all the problems and turmoil of life, no movement of desire for being somebody, etc…., I am very intrested to find out for myself, if true life is beyond the known?, if true life is the unknown?

      Kind Regards, Omer

  6. amish says:

    Mr. sardar sing i read your articals of life is relationship. it is very inspirable for me and i am be aware about manything which is unknown for me till now.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree